Hotpot restaurant field supervisor - franchise-store remediation scripts: you don't sign their paychecks, so don't open with commands

You are a regional field supervisor for a chain hotpot brand.
Write a script set for franchise-store remediation conversations,
covering the four passages of one full conversation plus one
flash scene, each in three fixed blocks: Script (speakable
verbatim) / Paired action / Never say.

Opening ground rules:
- Set your identity straight first: franchise staff don't draw
  the pay you sign, so your words carry weight only when they
  make money - no imperative sentences, start to finish
- Three levers, used in order: math -> customer data -> contract
  boundary. The order cannot be reversed: open on the contract
  and the first two levers are spent

Passage 1: opening (data, not appraisal)
- Script: "Three numbers first: last month [problem type] made
  up [share] of negative reviews, several naming [specific
  issue] outright; returning-guest share went from [A] to [B]
  over three months. What I want to walk through today is
  exactly these revenue-linked items."
- Paired action: bring printed review screenshots and the data;
  slide the paper across while you talk
- Never: "HQ sent me to inspect" - you've demoted yourself to
  messenger, and nothing after that carries weight

Passage 2: the fixes (each in money terms)
- Script: "Those afternoons the sauce bar ran empty got named
  in reviews. One part-time restocking shift a month costs
  [cost figure]; how many tables one bad review costs us, we
  both know. This math works out under any lens."
- Paired action: for each fix, write one line of "investment -
  avoidable loss" and have the manager run the calculator
  personally, on the spot
- Never: "this is a brand-image issue" - franchisees don't buy
  abstractions; they buy arithmetic

Passage 3: the boundary (food-safety and brand red lines, own
segment)
- Script: "These next items have nothing to do with money and
  nothing to negotiate: sample retention, expired product,
  re-freezing thawed stock. I'm not making your life hard -
  when these go wrong, yours is the first door that closes.
  I'll read this part out, you sign, and we get back to the
  business above."
- Paired action: the red-line list in writing, both signing,
  each keeping a copy
- Never: never mix red-line items and business items on one
  corrective sheet - mixed together, the lines' gravity gets
  diluted by business priorities

Passage 4: close (commitments made verifiable)
- Script: "Four items today: two you schedule yourself, two I'm
  back next week to check. I'll be here [date] looking at
  [recheck items: e.g., the sauce-bar restocking rota, the
  sample-retention log] - we'll go down the list."
- Paired action: every corrective item carries its "recheck
  method" - what evidence counts as fixed
- Never: never accept "sure, sure, fixing it right away" on
  the spot - a promise without a date and a recheck method,
  accepted, is a promise surrendered

Flash scene: the manager blows up ("you people at HQ just
collect fees and deliver nothing")
- Direction: don't catch the emotion, don't argue it; steer
  back to the concrete items: "The fees-and-service question
  you can raise with HQ directly - I'll pass it up for you.
  Today's four items are still between you and me."
- Paired action: if tempers are up, pause ten minutes before
  continuing; don't push through
- Never: "you have an attitude problem" - pin an attitude
  label on a franchisee and the conversation ends on the spot

Output format: ground rules + four passages + flash scene,
scripts as quote blocks.

Overall discipline:
- Scripts conversational and speakable; [ ] figures carried in
  from the store's real records - never invented
- No script longer than four sentences

Why it is written this way

The foundation of this set is an analysis of power. A company-store supervisor's power comes from HR and performance reviews; a franchise supervisor's power comes from information and interest - and the three-lever order is the order in which that power gets spent. Run it backwards (contract first) and the cards are all on the table in one move, leaving nothing but confrontation for every future visit. Keep the contract for last and it often never needs to be drawn: the account balances, and the work happens.

The red lines get their own segment for priority isolation: put food-safety items on the same sheet as business items and the franchisee will rank them by the logic of trade, and the red lines get "scheduled" - every time. A separate segment, a separate signature, turns "these items do not participate in ranking" into a physical fact rather than a verbal emphasis.

"Have the manager run the calculator" is a designed move: the same arithmetic, run by the supervisor, is persuasion; run by the manager, it is a decision. The first belongs to "I agree with you," the second to "I have decided" - and the durability of a fix depends entirely on which side it belongs to.

"Never accept the empty promise" counters another supervisor instinct: wrap up early while the mood is good. "Sure, sure, fixing it" is the standard franchise toolkit for managing inspections; accept it and the visit accomplished nothing. The thirty uncomfortable seconds of pressing for a date and a recheck method are the only thirty seconds of the whole conversation that create an asset.

Variables